Login Form
ArtisteerArtisteer - Joomla Theme Generator

Quickest way to help your computer security? Avoid IE and Outlook!

I was at a friend's house just a couple of days ago.  He asked me to help him with some domain registrations.  Within a couple of minutes, I recognized the frustrating, tell-tale signs of some kind of malware/spyware infection.  His fancy new laptop is crawling like mountaintop molasses... I couldn't take it and said, "I've got to fix this 'puter before we go any further, what is wrong with this thing?"  "Oh, yeah," he says, "it was running fine until just the other day, and suddenly it started acting like this."

So, I dig up Spybot for him and download it.  In addition something has turned off his security center settings, and the laptop is pretty much just sitting open to the network.  After quite a bit of time downloading tools, booting into safe mode, running scans, and tweaking his settings, I get the darn thing running like it's supposed to run again.  Scans showed a variety of nasty bugs and one trojan horse running on his computer.  

"How did I get that stuff?  How can I avoid being infected?" He asks.  My reply? "Stop using Microsoft internet tools is the easiest, quickest answer I can give you.  That will vastly improve your security even without doing anything else."

Recent break-ins at Google and 20+ other big companies were all related to bugs in Internet Explorer.  Outlook has been a fertile field for crackers planting their bugs for years.  Why do people continue to use these tools when they're known to be insecure and buggy?  The easy answer goes back to the Microsoft antitrust settlement in the 90's, where it was revealed that MS forced computer manufacturers to include their crappy internet stuff in all computers shipped.  Microsoft threatened companies like Dell with losing their ability to purchase Windows cheaply if they did not comply, thus basically forcing the infection of millions of users with IE and Outlook, rather than users having tools that had been around for years back when MS was saying the internet would never amount to anything.  MS also made a rather poor decision to use their knowledge of their own operating system (Windows) to "integrate" their internet tools with the base operating system of the computer.  This was obviously another attempt to get a competitive edge on Netscape and other browsers of the time, using MS's knowledge of their Windows monopoly to the advantage of the newly formed browser group at MS.  Microsoft has always used this to their advantage, to make competitors' software run more slowly or more poorly than MS's own products.

There is also a more in-depth answer, which is also part of the antitrust problems with Microsoft.  When Microsoft finally decided they better pay attention to the internet, they ignored the W3C, the international body for WWW standards.  Rather than constructing their applications and servers to match everyone else's W3C compliance and ensure ease-of-use and interoperability, they just decided that they would impose their own, proprietary standards upon the pre-existing Web.  This was yet ANOTHER attempt to use their monopoly position on the desktop and laptop to exclude potential competitors for their browser and email application.

And so, even today, there are a number of websites, especially those running their crappy IIS webserver, that will not run correctly with any browser but IE.  So users who wish to run another browser, not only find that their computer comes with IE, and they have to know about and download a different browser, they will also find that since MS servers and browsers don't match the open, international standards of the internet, they have trouble viewing and using some websites.  Then on the flip side, Microsoft has made it also that sites that don't use their proprietary servers, will not run correctly WITH IE.  MS basically is saying, "screw the users, they're going to use our internet tools whether they like it or not!"

And that may explain, why Google was hacked using known exploits in IE, when Google has their own browser, Chrome.  Even I have IE on my Windows machines for the mere reason that every once in a while I find a site I MUST use IE with or it doesn't display or work correctly.  In fact I have 4 browsers on my computers that I can use if needed, and I advise others to do the same.

Microsoft recently revealed that they had known since August of last year about the hole in IE that was exploited by the Chinese crackers against Google and the other American companies that were penetrated and compromised.

Here are three other choices for browsing, that will drastically cut down on the likelihood that you will become infected or compromised:

  1. Opera - this is what I use most of the time.  I prefer it's integrated internet environment, with email, file transfer, notes, RSS news reader, everything in one environment.  I never have to leave Opera to do almost anything on the internet.  Opera also runs on my smart phone and my linux machines and servers. 
  2. Chrome - this is a very good tool, that is extremely fast and light, from Google.  Don't sign up for it to report all your browsing to Google though, if you value privacy.
  3. Firefox - a direct descendent of the original graphical internet browser, this is also a very advanced open-sourece tool with many sophisticated features and some very cool plugins (like SEO plugins) that have been developed for it.

I'll dig more into non-Microsoft internet applications for Windows and other operating systems in the next article in this series.

No microsoft tools, applications, or operating systems were used in the construction of this post Cool

 

Last updated (Friday, 05 February 2010 06:58)

 

Google and the NSA

It turns out that our friends at Google, who know more about you than you really want them to know, and our friends at the National Security Agency, who REALLY know more about you than you want ANYONE to know, are joining forces. The reason?  Google has asked for the NSA to work with them on a project to investigate the recent cracking incidents at Google.  Google was deeply penetrated, apparently, and lost some of their intellectual property.  They believe it was the work of crackers out of China.  Quite possibly, pros working for the Chinese government and/or military.

Ok, it's understandable that Google might approach the NSA for help on this.  But it's also extremely scary to see these two outfits working together.  It's difficult to imagine, that once collegial relationships are made, that the two biggest know-it-alls in the world will just stop with one project.   In my mind, this also makes one wonder about the CCP's (Chinese Communist Party - let's not forget who runs China!) claims that Google is somewhat of an arm, or a partner, to the US government.  I mean, here Google is denying all that in China, then they turn around and publicize a partnership with the NSA!!  That was intentional in some way, I'm sure, but to what end, I do not know.  Make of the story what you will, but don't doubt that there are plenty of opportunities for abuse and cronyism in such a partnership.  Just look at the recent FBI story where they obtained 2300 illegal wiretaps (or trace and traps, really) just by ASKING the phone companies for the data!  In at least one case, apparently on a POST IT NOTE! hahaha Talk about your warrantless wiretap!!  A post it note, people.  That's all it took for the FBI to get your private phone records!! 

OK that's a little too much government/private partnership for this privacy advocate and general government skeptic. Especially since, it turned out to be completely based on lies from the FBI about false emergencies and so forth.

This also points out something I've often believed about our Federal Government (ok state gov't too) - I believe that they PREFER communications monopolies.  They find that one or two big players in any communications field, including even the wild-and-woolly internet business, because it's easier to control just one or two players and easier to get information on citizens (and non-citizens) if they only have a couple of places to look.  Just look at the whole history of the magical re-morphing government-sanctioned-amoeba that is the AT&T system if you need evidence for this assertion.   There could be thousands more phone companies in this country, but nope - it was built and designed as a monopoly and I believe that part of the motivation (in addition to lucrative lobbyist campaign money) is control.  Control over YOU, the American Citizen.   Google and the NSA - a partnership from hell?  Maybe, I guess we'll just have to see - but it makes me uncomfortable.

Here is the story on Google and the NSA from the NY Times -

 

 

Building A Classroom Teacher's Site with Joomla Part 5a - creating a basic layout and design with Artisteer

It's now time to take a look at our basic website layout.  The absolute MOST IMPORTANT THING TO REMEMBER about this, is that the layout is separate from the content, and THE LAYOUT CAN BE CHANGED OR ALTERED AT WILL!  I've seen even very smart people, be fooled by this aspect of Joomla.  They see a particular look to a site in development, a particular layout, and they just think that the layout is going to be that way, that this is what it is going to look like, etc.,  I've realized over time that these clients aren't seeing what I'm seeing.  I'm seeing a look that is always temporary and ready for change, that can be made and remade like sculpting a piece of clay, then working it back into a ball and sculpting it into something different.  I'm seeing something that is really just a placeholder for the important part of the site - THE CONTENT!!  The content, and in large part that means text, is what the search engines care about, it's what they index and search, and it's the most information dense part of most websites.  So don't be fooled!  You can't judge a book by it's cover, you can't tell what someone is capable of by their clothes, and the various appearances which a site can adopt at will are nothing more than mere clothing on a base of content.  And actually it's probably more work to change your clothes than to change the look of a Joomla website.

That being said, I must admit that, at least this morning I'm having a hard time coming up with much of a starting look and feel for Lisa's site.  You can see what I've come up with so far but it's not really ... thrilling me just yet.   However I do like the plaid/tartan background for a school site.

I'm using a tool called Artisteer (advertised on the left) which is a great prototyping and design tool for Joomla.  It has a number of built-in prepackaged layouts, headers, menus, etc., that you can combine in whatever way you wish.  But it also does all the css and Joomla template coding for you in any custom format you might want to create.  It's highly recommended and is a great time saver - and it doesn't limit you as to what designs you might like.  

I'm going to take a little break and take some quiet time and give this some thought.  Then I'll come back to it and see what other kinds of layouts we might do.  Lisa likes this site:  Har-Ber High School but I'm personally not too thrilled with that one either.  I've written her to see what it is that she likes about it so much.

There is one other consideration - how exciting should a school/class site even be?  This isn't a video game and we're most worried about the functionality of the site, not a flashy appearance.   If anyone has suggestions, put 'em in the comments, I'm happy to listen.

 

Building A Classroom Teacher's Site with Joomla Part 5 - Replace Joomla's defaults

OK so we have our teacher's website all up and going.  But, it's only a base install with the default look and feel, and the default data that you can include with it.  I prefer to include the default data on the install and modify it later, because it gives at least a bit of structure to build on.  But I may be changing my mind about that on my next Joomla project.  Not sure I need anything but a blank slate anymore.  

At any rate, I don't wish to re-install so let's dig in and clean up the data that is on there now.  I don't need any of the articles that come with a default joomla install, so let's just mass-delete all of those.  We log into the administrative back end, and go to the article manager.  On the top left is a checkbox, that will cause all the articles to be checked.  We check that, and delete all articles.  

OK now let's take a look at other content we can delete or modify.  The front page is showing several modules, like the newsflashes and the poll, that we won't need right now for Lisa's website.  So let's just unpublish them.  This will leave them in the database for later modification and usage, rather than completely deleting them as we did with the articles.  We won't ever need the text from those articles, but it doesn't hurt to have some of these modules all set up and premade so we can merely modify them for our own usage later.  

We go into "module manager" and merely uncheck the "enabled" checkmark on the modules we don't want to use right now, which is most of them. 

OK so out of the many modules that come with the default Joomla install, we've only kept 8 of them in an enabled state.  Main menu, who's online, search, top menu, footer, syndication, user menu, and login form are the modules that we'll find most immediately handy for our application.

 

modules-enabled

 

Now then, this leaves us with a very clean basic set of menus and modules with which to start our site development, as you can see below.  In our next article, we will use a tool I really like called "Artisteer" to create a nice look and feel for the site, and modify the layout.  Then, we will begin to add the tools and software integration we need to do the things that Lisa wants for her kids.

We've also, at Lisa's request, decided to make this project larger by adding Moodle into the mix.  I've never worked with Moodle so this should be very fun and educational for all of us, including myself!! 

Here is our cleaned up default Joomla install:

 

lisa-default-post-cleanup

 

 

 



Last updated (Tuesday, 02 February 2010 10:59)

 

Sign Up For the iPad - And Why You Can't Get it Now

 

ipad

I'm definitely ordering a top-of-the-line iPad, as quickly as possible.  Now, some people are saying that you might be better off waiting for the second generation, and they're probably right in many ways.  But for myself, I think I will need one to report on it's usage here on cst.net and when I'm ready for the next version, I can give the first one to my child or sell it on Ebay or here on the site.  Why top-of-the-line?  Because of the price difference.  The difference between the very best iPad with the absolute most features, memory, and communications capabilities and the worst iPad appears to be only $329 - so why would anyone order the bottom-of-the-barrel model, with no cellular (3G) capability and only 1/4 as much memory?  The answer? "I have no idea."

See iPad pricing here

Earlier today, Apple had a very basic mis-coding on their website that prevented one from clicking through to the pre-order page, so I will include the URL to be notified when the iPad is available for ordering here:

Apple iPad Notification of Availability

It appears that they may have fixed their URL problem in the last few minutes, at least from here in Vail it appears so.  It was the typical old mistake of putting a slash in front of a relative URL so it became just /ipad/ by itself instead of www.apple.com/ipad/ - kinda funny to see such an old-school mistake made by an industry leader.  But, it happens.

Anyway there are some stories going around the 'net right now that the iPad is not yet FCC approved, and thus it's not legal for Apple to sell them yet, even as a pre-order.  Apparently, due to several factors, the iPad feature set will vary from one region to another, even within the USA, not to mention from one nation to another, so that is another consideration.  You likely will not be able to use all the features of the iPad in all the regions in which you might travel.  Here is more on this story from our friends at Wired Magazine - an old favorite of mine!

Wondering Why You Can’t Pre-Order an iPad? It Isn’t Legal Yet

Last updated (Sunday, 31 January 2010 15:38)

 

Jobs Goes Off on Google!!

steve_jobs_630x

FINALLY a tech leader SAYS IT - JOBS GOES OFF ON GOOGLE ... hallelujah and thank you Steve!! Jobs says Google's "Don't be evil" mantra is BULLSHIT!! YES!! It's about damn time more people recognized it ... ROCK ON STEVE !! I'll definitely buy an iPad now !!

For YEARS now, Google has hidden behind their formerly golden reputation as a worth opponent and possibly slayer of the evil Microsoft dragon.  Goodness knows, back in the late 90's when Microsoft was sticking me and my technicians with the costs of supporting their "free" crap internet browser and their "free" crap internet email client - which was forced on users by MS pressuring OEM's to include them on all computers shipped (see the anti-trust settlement if you don't believe me ... it's unbelievable!!) - back then I was a HUGE Google fanboy.  Plus I loved their story, two young computer scientists come up with a new and relatively simple way to index and search the giant database that is the WWW.  Awesome.  But then I've seen them morph over the years into just a mirror image of the very thing I thought they were opposing.  I credit much of this change to the influence of the Venture Capitalists who funded Google's pre-IPO growth and their hive mentality.  Hiring Eric to run the business end, and basically putting Serge and Larry in charge of "green initiatives" and all kinds of fun social goodness BS (so they would be out of the way, in my opinion) was a signal that the good company that Google started out to be had begun to morph into something evil.  Their monopolistic and octopus like behavior over the years has only proven that.

Well the media people (newspapers and book publishers especially) and the other leaders in the tech industry, are finally not only catching on, but willing to express the evil reality that is Google today.   Now it appears that someone that was there when I started into computers in the late 70's (I still have Apple and Apple II ads in my late 70's BYTE magazine collection!) is stepping up and finally saying out loud what everyone's been thinking for years - the "don't be evil" mantra is total and complete bullshit.  Here's the story from Wired:

Google’s ‘Don’t Be Evil’ Mantra is ‘Bullshit,’ Adobe Is Lazy: Apple’s Steve Jobs

And yes, I do have Google adsense on these pages, and I do use some Google tools.  I do that largely because my choices are very limited - thanks, in large part, to Google themselves.

And I don't think they're completely evil - as with Darth Vader "there is still good within them."  They are master technologists, that's without question.  But I, and many friends in the internet business, have reason to understand just how evil Google can be, upon their whim, and to whom they please.  They can literally make or break websites at their whim, they can raise and lower your traffic with absolutely no explanation of why, or how.  There is NO ONE AT GOOGLE YOU CAN TALK TO ABOUT ANYTHING.  If you don't believe me, just try to call them.  It's literally impossible.  Email them, you get a form letter spit back by a computer.  No one is home, and if you DO get to talk to someone, all they say is "it's the algorithm, it's the algorithm..." like some kind of zombies worshiping at a Santeria ceremony.

Sometime soon, I will write an entire article about my experiences with Google and those of my friends in the business.  But suffice it to say, there is a definitely a dark side to the GOOG and it's getting biggger.

I hope Steve and some of the other Silicon Valley leaders can actually do something about it.  Or maybe some new search technology will step forth.  I had big hopes for Wolfram Alpha, as I've always be a fan of his, but it's been a disappointment thus far.  At any rate, read and comment here at cst.net about this topic... it's really very important to all of us in tech as to who and what will slow the Google train down.

As it is, we might well be getting into an IBM of the 60's and 70's or MS of the 80's and 90's situation here with Google if something doesn't happen to break their hold on the web.

Last updated (Sunday, 31 January 2010 15:36)

 

CST Tweets

Search cst.net
My Calendar
February 2010
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
1 2 3 4 5

6

7

8 9 10 11 12

13

14

15 16 17 18 19

20

21

22 23 24 25 26

27

28

Blog Categories
Who's Online
We have 17 guests online